Lindsay Lohan has settled her $100 million lawsuit accusing  E*Trade Financial Corp of modeling a "milkaholic" baby girl in a  television commercial after her without permission, a lawyer for the  actress said.
Lohan withdrew her  lawsuit against the New York-based online brokerage on Monday, court  records show. The lawsuit was withdrawn with prejudice, meaning it  cannot be brought again. The terms of a settlement were not immediately  available.
E*Trade spokeswoman  Allison Jeannotte said in a statement: "It was a simple business  decision. We always have to consider the cost and time involved in  litigation, and we are pleased to have the matter behind us."
Lohan sued E*Trade on March 8, alleging its  use of a baby girl named Lindsay in an ad violated her privacy. 
In the ad, a baby boy  apologizes to his girlfriend through a video chat for not calling her  the night before because he was on E*Trade. The camera switches to the  girl, who asks suspiciously, "And that milkaholic Lindsay wasn't over?"
It then switches back  to the boy, who uneasily replies "Lindsay?" before another baby girl,  presumably Lindsay, moves into the frame and asks, "Milk-a-what?"
E*Trade's ad was part  of a series featuring babies who play the markets. It was shown in this  year's Super Bowl, which Nielsen media said drew a record 106.5 million  U.S. viewers.
Lawyers for Lohan  argued that, while other famous women are named "Lindsay" or "Lindsey,"  like skier Lindsey Vonn and actress Lindsay Wagner, by "process of  elimination" it was their client whom E*Trade used to model the baby  girl and her pronunciation of milkaholic "in a drunken state of mind."
Separately on Monday,  Lohan was ordered to appear in a Los Angeles court on September 24 after  admitting she failed a court-ordered drug test following her release  from jail and a stint in drug rehabilitation.
Friday's hearing is  expected to determine whether Lohan, 24, returns to jail.
The New York case is  Lohan v. E*Trade Securities LLC et al, New York State Supreme Court, New  York County, No. 601016/2010.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment