LOS ANGELES  - "The Social Network" has as its protagonist a  character drawn in a Shakespearean mode, a high-achieving individual who  carries within him the seeds of his own destruction. This would, of  course, be young Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg), the man behind the  social-network phenomenon Facebook.
As the movie makes  abundantly clear, the facts behind its founding are in dispute but,  without a doubt, Zuckerberg did create Facebook. Yet far from  celebrating this feat, the movie examines how a man who cares little  about money became the world's youngest billionaire yet lost his one  true friend. At least that's what the movie says happened.
The film, written by  Aaron Sorkin, is based on Ben Mezrich's book "The Accidental  Billionaires" and Sorkin's own research yet neither writer, predictably,  was able to talk to Zuckerberg to get his point of view. So it is as a  fictional construct -- based on ample public sources, however -- that  "Mark Zuckerberg" achieves its Shakespearean dimension. He gains the  whole world but loses his most meaningful asset because of a fatal flaw  on view in the very first scene.
"Social" has the  potential to be that rarity -- a film that gains critical laurels and  award mentions yet also does killer box office. Certainly, Sorkin, the  film's director, David Fincher, and its heavyweight producers have  crafted a smart, insightful film that satisfies both camps. The hook is  the film's of-the-moment topic but the payoff is its hero. Or antihero  or villain or whatever.
The very first scene?  Harvard undergrad Mark and his girlfriend, Erica (Rooney Mara), are  trying to have a dinner date at a noisy Cambridge brew pub. Or at least  she's trying. He's talking a mile a minute with every syllable screaming  egocentricity and dripping with sarcasm and defensive insecurity. She  can't even change the topic. Indeed, she can't even tell what the topic  is. After one insult too many, it's easier for Erica to break up with  Mark. So the flaw is most ironic -- the guy who will revolutionize the  way people communicate can't communicate himself. He is virtually blind  to anyone else's perspective.
Annoyed, Mark jogs  home to get drunk, hit his computer and, to take his mind off Erica,  accidentally invents Facebook. Okay, it's not Facebook; it's Facemash, a  stupid idea that only a genius computer hacker/scientist would dream up  in which he hacks into Harvard's computer system, downloads all photos  from the "facebooks" of the university's houses and asks students to  vote on which girls are the hottest.
The contest goes  viral, crashes Harvard's computer system, earns Mark a reprimand from  authorities but attracts the attention of Harvard twins Cameron and  Tyler Winklevoss (Armie Hammer and Josh Pence). These are wealthy and  privileged scholar-athletes trying to develop an inner-campus website to  create a place for students to meet, greet and perhaps score dates.  They approach the anarchist-hacker, who is intrigued by their idea but  prefers to go to his best friend and fellow Jew, Eduardo Saverin (Andrew  Garfield), to finance a social network that contains elements of the  Winklevosses' idea but transforms it into what we now know as Facebook.
Then the rest of the  movie, in an inspired move by Sorkin, takes place at legal depositions.  Because a few years later, Facebook is a billion-dollar miracle and  lawsuits are flying everywhere: The twins and their Indian-American  partner Divya Narendra (Max Minghella, who doesn't look or act Indian),  and Eduardo, who has been frozen out of Facebook thanks to the  Svengali-like efforts of Napster creator Sean Parker (Justin  Timberlake), are all suing Mark.
As everyone recollects  his version of events, the film flashes back to these developments. You  understand no one's testimony is reliable but Sorkin tries to sort out  the possible scenario that lands everyone in this legal soup. The story  thus becomes a tale of power, fame, betrayal, revenge and  responsibility.
Under Fincher's astute  direction the characters fairly pop out at you. Even in a one-scene  performance, famed Harvard president Larry Summers (Douglas Urbanski)  startles the viewer with his abrupt impatience and sterling wit as he  dismisses the twins' heavy-handed attempt to enlist the school in their  cause. Fincher also places events in milieus that ring true. His  portrait of campus life among America's elite is pitch-perfect, every  bit as much as the drug-and-party excesses of Silicon Valley and the war  rooms of corporate attorneys.
There have been  complaints from early screenings that no one is very likable in this  movie. You'll get no argument here but that's beside the point. "Mark  Zuckerberg" is thoroughly unlikable but he is an original. Ask yourself:  How many truly original characters show up in American movies? Mark  exists in his own world. He dresses like he just rolled out of bed and  doesn't relate to people half as well as he does to computers,  algorithms and user databases. He finds people, at best, helpful to his  creations or, at worst, annoying. He cannot speak civilly to anyone yet  has the verbal skills to hone in on sore points with his acquaintances.  His oral jousting with the deposing attorneys is brilliantly rendered in  dialogue Sorkin presumably lifted from transcripts.
About the only  character that comes off well is Garfield's Eduardo. The guy seems to  care genuinely about his ex-friend and is bitterly unhappy about his  treatment by Mark. Everyone else is borderline manic, such as Eduardo's  sweet-and-sour girlfriend, played by a Brenda Song.
The production is the  best studios can offer with Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross' hypnotically  repetitive score, Jeff Cronenweth's fluid, sparkling cinematography and  Donald Graham Burt's pinpoint-accurate production design all major  pluses. There's no flaw here. So the film comes down to a mesmerizing  portrait of a man who in any other age would perhaps be deemed nuts or  useless, but in the Internet age has this mental agility to transform an  idea into an empire. Yet he still cannot rule his own life to the point  he doesn't lose what's important to him. At least that's what the movie  says.
 

 
No comments:
Post a Comment